Get Help

I’m building a paywall with the builder and I’m testng in on my app, in Google Play Console I’ve set a 7 days free trial for both offers (Annual and Monthly), but I don’t see the “Try for 7 days then 5€ a month” text, I see the basic one (Full access for just {{ product.price_per_period_abbreviated }}). Maybe because I’m using the same account I have already used to test subscriptions? The account is a test account for the app, shouldn’t I always get a fresh paywall lke it was the first time? Basically what I want is simple, if free trial is available show free trial text, otherwise the basic text.Can you explain to me how to setup this the right way?    

I also posted this in another category. An employee deleted the project from our RevenueCat account and we think even deleted the account. It is hooked up to manage payment on a React Native app. We cannot access the dashboard to contact support in hopes of getting the account restored. 

An employee deleted the project from our RevenueCat account and we think even deleted the account. It is hooked up to manage payment on a React Native app. We cannot access the dashboard to contact support in hopes of getting the account restored.

We have a free App on the stores of Apple and Google and sell via IAP subscriptions to use our service using the RevenueCat paywall. This works well for B2C customers and should remain.But B2B customers want to buy license packages of e.g. 50 licenses and assign those to users within their organization. Therefore we need the ability to sell subscription licenses in bulk.The amount of licenses must be flexible to suit customers of different size.Ideally this can be done through our existing WooCommerce shop where customers would select the license amount from a dropdown. These bundles should then also be unlocked/processed via the paywall in RevenueCat to avoid changing our App and to maintain the B2C offer. I did all the work on the WooCommerce side to sell licenses and was able to pull web orders using n8n and make.com. But I struggle to create entitlements in RC using the REST API. According to latest ruling, this process should be allowe

I am considering whether a unique device ID is suitable as user ID for my use case.I came up with the following  subsequent scenarios / concept, can someone confirm or correct my understanding of how RevenueCat works?----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------BaselineThe App uses Device ID as RevenueCat User ID -> identified User.The scenarios take place on iOS.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Scenario 1User named Timinstalls App on Device ID 1234ABC with Apple ID tim.cook@apple.com and makes a purchase in the AppResult: Receipt is stored with Apple ID, Purchase associated with Device ID is stored in RevenueCat--------------------------

I am experiencing a layout discrepancy between the RevenueCat Paywall Editor preview and the actual rendering on iOS devices. (I’m using Flutter.) Image 1: Preview from the RevenueCat Paywall Edit Page.Image 2: A screenshot from the iOS Simulator (The same issue occurs on a physical iPhone 14).  As shown in the second image, the height of each membership package card is significantly enlarged compared to the preview. And the badge on the last membership package is being cut off.What could be causing this issue specifically on iOS? Image 1 (RevenueCat Paywall Edit Page.)Image2 (A screenshot from the iOS Simulator)

Hey everyone 👋We’ve been experimenting with exit offers and rewrote our paywall presentation flow on iOS. We moved from embedding PaywallView to using presentPaywallIfNeeded.However, we encountered a couple of questions about exit offers during testing. No client-side signal when an exit offer is shownThere’s no local callback or hook in the SwiftUI presenter API that tells us when an exit offer is displayed or which offering is shown.We can see this in RevenueCat debug logs, but we found no way of observing it. Since we track conversions and funnels via Mixpanel, this makes it hard to understand:Whether an exit offer was shown Whether a conversion came from the main paywall or the exit offer Exit offers always show on dismissExit offers appear every time the user dismisses the paywall. Many users open the paywall, quickly close it, and conti

I need to get the purchase data with RC_Transaction_ID on server, because I have to process the data and return the state to client before waiting webhook to arrive. I have searched the documentation and all the forums, and it seems like there is no easy way to do it. why? Current v2 api:I can get the purchases on customer, but it returns all purchases, and I have to match the one with transaction id, also if there is too much data, we have to paginate on server! I guess I can get it with two separate calls, but why? slow and will hit the genereous rate limit of 480 requests per minute.     So please RC, can you help

Hi! I’m currently evaluating the Virtual Currency feature for our iOS+Backend app. At the moment, I’m intentionally not using an authentication system to reduce user friction and churn. Instead, I rely on RevenueCat’s default anonymous app user IDs and Apple’s restore mechanism. This worked well so far for entitlements: when a user deletes and reinstalls the app, RevenueCat correctly restores purchases and migrates entitlements to the new anonymous user ID after a restore. However, I’m struggling to understand how this is supposed to work with virtual currencies. From reading the docs, it seems that virtual currency balances are strictly tied to the RevenueCat app user ID and

Hi there,I am new to using RevenueCat with Capacitor and I'm encountering an issue during initialization. I attempted to configure RevenueCat using Purchases.configure within my application code, but the process returns an error code of -1. Could you please advise on what might be causing this issue and how I can resolve it?Thank you for your assistance!

I'm using custom fonts in my iOS app. They're provided via a Design System Swift Package and registered programmatically using `CTFontManagerRegisterFontsForURL`: private static func registerFonts() { guard let fontURLs = Bundle.module.urls(forResourcesWithExtension: "ttf", subdirectory: nil) else { return } for url in fontURLs { var error: Unmanaged<CFError>? let success = CTFontManagerRegisterFontsForURL( url as CFURL, .process, &error ) // ... error handling }}The fonts are registered at app launch before Revenue Cat Paywall is displayed. However, when the Paywall tries to use these fonts, the SDK appears to not detect that they're already registered and attempts to download them from the Revenue Cat CDN, resulting in this error:GSFont: "NewSp

Currently I’m reviewing my access flow with API V2. Right now I am using list subscriptions https://www.revenuecat.com/docs/api-v2#tag/Customer/operation/list-subscriptions to capture current_period_starts_at and current_period_ends_at. I use these currently along with gives_access, and status to determine used monthly usage quotas and access. The process seems to work well and line up with what I’m seeing in the docs. However, my issue come in when status = in_grace_period. Its unclear to me how I can determine the access period range if grace period is active. I read about grace_period_expires_date being used for this in the docs and older community posts, but this field doesn’t seem to exist in API V2 (only in the docs for v1).What approach is proper using the V2 API? 

Hello! Could I please get some guidance on a code change for my app to address a crash that appears to be tied to some code from a RevenueCat sample project? I have a shortcut that launches my iOS app and then navigates to a View. I realized that there is a crash scenario. If I initially run the shortcut from the Shortcuts app when the app wasn’t running it correctly launches the app and navigates to the View. However, if I then go back to the Shortcuts app and run the shortcut again the system correctly switches to the app but then the app crashes. To investigate I ran the app in debug mode and was quite surprised to see where it was crashing. It was inside of my tip jar, which I haven’t changed the core logic for since I first developed my app in 2023. I used the Magic Weather SwiftUI sample project as a basis for the consumable, in-app purchases in my tip jar. Here’s the code that was causing the issue:

Looking into the REST API v1 and v2 and what the web sdk does, I’ve noticed that https://api.revenuecat.com/rcbilling/v1/subscribers/<user_id>/products?id=<product_id> is kind of what we need. Is it safe to use? I don’t see any documentation around.Thanks! 

I’m testing our RC paywall on my phone on a test version of the app (iOS).We have an in-app purchase set up in RC and linked to the paywall (not a subscription purchase).When I tap the buy button, a page appears saying “Redeem Special Offer” with a box to enter a code. There is no special offer and I don’t want this page here. How do I edit the paywall so that it doesn’t show?

We use AppsFlyer for attribution and RevenueCat for subscriptions. I am referring to this article: We currently call Purchases.collectDeviceIdentifiers(); again after the user has given ATT consent.What is not clear to me though: Do we have to collect IDFA consent before signup and before showing the paywall / any purchase happening? Or does that not matter?Thanks

 I have cross checked the bundleid and isuserId with app store connect and also re-upload multiple time but i am getting same validation issue

how can we dynamically set the value of free trial duration in our paywall , like i have a 7 day free trial introductory offer in appstore connect , and in revenuecat paywall introductory offer , i show Start your 7-day free trial , now I want to switch to 3-day free trial in appstore connect so how can I set it dynamically in revenuecat paywall so as not to misrepresentation of free trail duration and face appstore rejection 

Hi can I get access to the beta for paywall analytics?

I get the error 'SubscriptionPeriod' is ambiguous for type lookup in this context. during a ReactNative iOS build in DraftBit since version 9.7 of react-native-purchases. I reverted to 9.6.15 and the error disappeared. The error appeared in this line:static func rc_normalized(subscriptionPeriod: SubscriptionPeriod) -> StringIs there something I can do to fix this?

I’ve been getting warnings about an old unused offering which does not let me delete.How can I get rid of these warnings?The sometimes hang the simulator / emulator tests ( not on real device ).I can not seem to delete this offering even though they are deleted from the app store.If I can delete it from the app store, revenuecat should let me delete it as well. Am I wrong?What am I missing? 

I understand RevenueCat doesn’t support Windows and Linux for Flutter for now. I’m new to RevenueCat, so I want to know whether there are any workarounds to allow users pay when they are using Windows or Linux. For example, directing to web? If it’s possible, how?

Good Evening, I have been working with Revenue cat’s flutter SDK, this is my code:  var configuration = PurchasesConfiguration('goog_**********');configuration.entitlementVerificationMode = EntitlementVerificationMode.informational;await Purchases.configure(configuration); After configuring the SDK, I think it fetches the products automatically which I don’t want. I have only one product (infinity) which is a non-consumable product. However what I see in logs:I/[Purchases] - INFO( 3470): ℹ️ Missing productDetails: UnfetchedProduct{productId='infinity', productType='subs', statusCode=3}I/[Purchases] - INFO( 3470): ℹ️ Product not found: infinity - Product Type: subs, Reason: PRODUCT_NOT_FOUND, Serialized doc ID:  I dont have any subscription product, yet it fetches a subs type product and could not find it.What is the solution for this error? Or am I making some mist

Hello,We’re planning to compare the transaction data from our service with RevenueCat’s transaction data in order to identify: missing orders mismatched subscription renewal status discrepancies in refund status Our plan is to run this as a batch job once a day during off-peak hours.From what I’ve seen, Scheduled Data Exports seems to be the most suitable RevenueCat feature for this purpose.Do you think this is the right choice? If there's a better alternative, I’d really appreciate your input.

Events are arriving in Meta Events Manager, but Eligibility results Subscribe and Start trial (App Promotion) as Integration = Conversions API and Ineligible (“Not enough signals from last 30 days”)If I set app-level integration to SDK, eligibility flips everything to SDK. And it WORKS.  How should Subscribe/StartTrial be configured with RevenueCat so they’re eligible for App Promotion optimization (while avoiding mixed-integration issues / double counting)?ATT is enabled. The events are arriving fine and only from Conversions API. The App level for receiving events is switched to Conversions API. Almost the same issue as referenced here (around 7th minute): Same issue as discussed here: https://youtu.be/goI-oAn8KYU