We currently have an AB test running, but the results seem confusing. The tests shows the following numbers:

Variant A has an annual price of $49.99 and Variant B $59.99. From this, it seems more intuitive to me that Variant A is outperforming because the price of B is only 20% higher than A’s, but there are more than double the amount of active subscriptions in Variant A.
Yet, the results section suggests:
“Based on our most recent run of the model, at 1 years, there is a 67% chance that Variant B has a higher LTV.”
Can you explain to me where this result comes from? Maybe there’s just a lack of additional data in the dashboard that would show the real reason, but with the data available, it seems very off for us.
Thanks
Best answer by ryan
View original